INDEPENDENCE DAY -15.08.2012 - INDIA @65

Well, after a year of policy inaction, high inflation, and slowing growth; it's now 65 years since Indian Independence.

Below are links to a couple of articles that are well worth a read.
Ruchir Sharma and Swami Aiyar have an interesting take on Indian Independence and the Outlook for India's economic growth rate amidst a slowing and deleveraging global economy

RUCHIR SHARMA :
India's breakout path: It needs to break global growth script, not slavishly follow it

SWAMINATHAN AIYAR:
Independence Day: Why Partition was a good thing for India

Y.V. REDDY - ON REGULATION, BANKING AND REFORMS

Below is a link to an article from today's Economic Times.

Y.V.Reddy was the steady hand at the head of India's Central Bank ( The R.B.I) that guided the Indian Banking system through the crises of 2008-2009.

Interview with Y.V.REDDY (Former Governor, Reserve bank of India)17 Jul, 2012,
Shaji Vikaraman & Gayatri NayakShaji Vikaraman & Gayatri Nayak,ET Bureau

Link: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/interviews/banks-have-to-be-board-driven-government-should-not-dictate-their-operations-yv-reddy-former-rbi-governor/articleshow/15011122.cms?curpg=2

"Banks have to be board-driven, government should not dictate their operations: YV Reddy, Former RBI governor"

Some edited excerpts:

There is growing criticism, both internally and overseas, about policy inertia and inept economic management by the government. What is your assessment and what, in your view, should the government do to swiftly address some of the issues on the economic front?

I cannot comment off the cuff. But I will draw back and say what IG Patel's perception of reform is. One major point he made was about the distinction between macroeconomic management and micro-sectional reforms. Macroeconomic management has, by and large, been good in India. Yet some reforms are needed. His emphasis was on sectional reforms and efficiency of the reforms.

The broader aspect is that three areas were not sufficiently addressed. One is the issue of corruption, second is confidence of civil society, and third is higher education. So, in a way, we should not think that if you keep deregulating, it is reforms.
Then there are issues in the global economy. Does that mean we should not move forward? I don't think reforms as contemplated before the crisis should be blindly carried forward. In considering reforms, efficiency should be a criterion. Macroeconomic balance is important. Macroeconomic imbalances create instability. We require growth impulse and it depends on savings and investments and productivity.

Recently, Dr Rangarajan said that even without changing the banking regulation laws, the RBI could consider issuing bank licences. Do you agree?

No, I don't agree. Purely from the global crisis situation, all over the world, they are very strict from the regulatory perspective. Even before they experienced the crisis, the Reserve Bank had requested some regulatory framework for regulating the banks, that is absolute necessary minimum.

So if the government is not able to give minimum power to the regulator, it is inappropriate to give any more licences till the law is changed and the regulator has enough regulatory (jurisdiction/freedom), more so because the type of entities that are likely to get the banking licences.

You already have Indian corporates in the mutual fund industry, they have got interconnected insurance companies, they have interconnected NBFCs, and then if you add banks, then it going to be extremely difficult for a regulator. The whole conglomerate structure - it is not only going to be a financial conglomerate, but an industrial-cum-financial-cum-banking conglomerate - becomes too big to regulate.

Indian Banking - Cases of Debt Recasts and NPAs

Here is a Newspaper Article on  "Rising cases of debt recasts & NPAs" by Abhijit Lele & Ranju Sarkar, from the Business Standard Newspaper in Mumbai.

Link:
Rising cases of debt recasts & NPAs ( check out the graphics pdf for charts and more info)
I've also attached adcanned copy of the article below

As some over leveraged companies work their way out of some rather sticky situations, it's another reminder to investors to check exactly how leveraged some of the companies they invest in really are.

High interest rates in India coupled with the reluctance of the inflation battling "Reserve Bank of India", the country's Central bank to lower interest rates; will mean that we could be in for some more restructuring of NPAs going forward.

INDIAN EQUITIES -DEBT WORRIES SURFACE AS THE ECONOMY SLOWS

As the Indian Economy slows, a number of Indian Corporates may find that they over-stretched themselves while the going was good, and are now saddled with heavy debts to repay.

It's not that borrowing for business expansion is a bad thing in itself, it's just that some over-leveraged Corporates will struggle with debt servicing in 2012.

Some sectors that come to mind are the Airlines, Oil services, Ship- building and infrastructure.

Investors must keep in mind that although many stocks in these sectors trade at record low valuations, the Risk -Reward ratio may still not favour investors at this stage.

Remember some stocks have been beaten down for well deserved reasons, and investors must analyse their own risk return profiles before jumping in now.

In my view, many companies will need some debt restructuring before they can trurn things around.
This could mean that the banking sector too could take a while to recover, at least until interest rate cuts expected in the near future ease the liquidity concern of some cash strapped corporates.

Invest wisely!